In Colorado, Amendment 131 and ranked choice voting (RCV) have sparked considerable debate about how we elect our leaders. If you’re unfamiliar with RCV or unsure what Amendment 131 brings to the table, let’s walk through it all. This is a matter that speaks to both the heart of democracy and the future of voter representation here in Colorado.
What is Ranked Choice Voting?
At its core, ranked choice voting is a system where voters don’t just choose their top candidate but rank them in order of preference. It’s a system designed to ensure that the winner has broad support across the electorate, not just from a passionate minority. Let’s break it down:
- Voters rank candidates: Instead of choosing just one candidate, voters rank them—1st, 2nd, 3rd, and so on.
- Counting votes: If a candidate gets over 50% of the first-choice votes, they win. Simple enough.
- Elimination and redistribution: If no candidate reaches that 50% threshold, the candidate with the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated. Voters who chose the eliminated candidate as their first choice will have their second-choice vote counted instead. This process repeats until a candidate passes the 50% mark.
Proponents argue that RCV is a more democratic system. It helps avoid the “spoiler effect,” where a third-party candidate can split votes, leading to a less-popular candidate winning. It also ensures that the winner is someone with broad, if not unanimous, support.
The Push for Ranked Choice Voting in Colorado
Colorado is one of several states where advocates are pushing for the implementation of RCV at the statewide level. Cities like Boulder and Fort Collins already use it, and proponents want to see it extended to more localities and even state elections.
The goal? Make elections more representative and encourage a healthier political climate. By giving voters more choices, the idea is to reduce extreme partisanship and foster a system where elected officials have to appeal to a broader spectrum of the electorate.
Arguments For and Against RCV
Proponents of RCV say it:
- Encourages more civility in campaigns. Candidates know they need to appeal to not only their base but also to voters who may list them as a second or third choice. This can reduce negative campaigning.
- Supports third-party candidates. In traditional elections, a third-party candidate often acts as a “spoiler” who siphons votes away from the major party candidates. With RCV, voters can choose their preferred outsider candidate without fear of “wasting” their vote.
- Increases voter engagement. RCV could help increase turnout because voters feel they have more of a say in the final outcome.
On the flip side, opponents of RCV argue:
- It’s confusing. Opponents argue that it’s too complex, and voters may not fully understand how their votes are counted. This could lead to distrust in the process.
- It’s costly to implement. Colorado, with its diverse mix of small rural towns and large cities, would need to invest significantly in new voting equipment and voter education campaigns.
- It might not solve partisanship. Some argue that while RCV aims to reduce extreme partisanship, it won’t fundamentally change the tribalism present in politics today.
Amendment 131: A Response to Ranked Choice Voting?
Amendment 131, proposed for the 2024 Colorado ballot, directly addresses the potential statewide adoption of RCV. Under this amendment, Colorado would not be permitted to implement ranked choice voting in state elections. Essentially, it acts as a preemptive strike against RCV advocates, blocking the expansion of the system before it becomes a statewide reality.
Supporters of Amendment 131 argue that the traditional voting system has worked well enough and there’s no need to complicate it. Some worry that RCV will cause voter confusion and lead to unfair outcomes. Others fear that the state’s election infrastructure isn’t prepared to handle the switch.
On the other hand, opponents of Amendment 131 see it as a step backward, preventing necessary reforms to our election process. They argue that as more cities and states move toward RCV, Colorado should be leading the charge, not resisting it.
How Would Amendment 131 Impact Colorado?
If passed, Amendment 131 would enshrine Colorado’s current election system in the state constitution, effectively banning the use of ranked choice voting for state-level races, though cities like Boulder could continue to use it for local elections. This would stop RCV advocates from pushing the system into larger statewide races such as gubernatorial or Senate elections.
In a state that has shown an openness to election reform, this amendment could halt any momentum RCV has gained. Whether that’s good or bad depends on your point of view. If you’re skeptical about making elections more complex, this amendment offers protection. But if you’re hopeful for reform, it feels like a roadblock to progress.
What’s Next?
Like many issues on the ballot, ranked choice voting and Amendment 131 will divide opinions. If you’re passionate about ensuring fair representation, it’s worth diving deeper into both sides. Whether you believe RCV is the future or prefer sticking with the tried-and-true system, it’s crucial that we, as voters, stay informed.
As November 2024 approaches, expect the conversation to heat up. Both supporters and opponents of Amendment 131 will be working hard to make their case to the Colorado electorate. If nothing else, it’s a fascinating debate about the direction of our democracy, and it deserves your attention.
Sources:
